Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Carbapenem resistance, inappropriate empiric treatment and outcomes among patients hospitalized with Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infection, pneumonia and sepsis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Murat Akova
4 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank DeLeo
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierluigi Viale
18 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marya Zilberberg
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marya Zilberberg
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marya Zilberberg
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Murat Akova
14 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marya Zilberberg
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Marya Zilberberg
Resubmission - Version 6
3 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
5 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2383-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement