Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analyses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Hamilton
13 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manish Pareek
10 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Pease
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Hamilton
10 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Christopher Pease
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2377-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement