Efficacy and completion rates of rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP) compared to other treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review with network meta-analyses
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Hamilton|
|13 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Manish Pareek|
|10 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Pease|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Hamilton|
|10 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Pease|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2377-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.