This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A framework for evaluating epidemic forecasts
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 28 July 2016
Accepted: 29 March 2017
Published: 15 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Farzaneh Sadat Tabataba|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Moss|
|17 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan D Sugimoto|
|18 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Farzaneh Sadat Tabataba|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jonathan D Sugimoto|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2365-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.