Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness of CRAG-LFA screening for cryptococcal meningitis among people living with HIV in Uganda

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Van De Vijver
25 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josue Mbonigaba
18 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Anu Ramachandran
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Van De Vijver
31 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Josue Mbonigaba
1 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anu Ramachandran
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anu Ramachandran
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12879-017-2325-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement