This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Risk factors for excessively prolonged meropenem use in the intensive care setting: a case-control study
- Juri Katchanov†1Email author,
- Benno Kreuels†2, 5,
- Florian P. Maurer3,
- Kai Wöstmann4,
- Johannes Jochum2,
- Christina König1, 4,
- Kariem Seoudy4,
- Holger Rohde3,
- Ansgar W. Lohse2,
- Dominic Wichmann1,
- Michael Baehr4,
- Camilla Rothe2 and
- Stefan Kluge1
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 27 October 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 8 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Natal Santos da Silva|
|8 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fredrik Resman|
|11 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Juri Katchanov|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2229-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.