This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Is it still worthwhile to perform quarterly cd4+ t lymphocyte cell counts on hiv-1 infected stable patients?
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 July 2016
Accepted: 10 January 2017
Published: 6 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Concetta Postorino|
|31 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Valeria Avanzi|
|29 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Antonio Di Biagio|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Antonio Di Biagio|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2199-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.