This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Diagnostic dilemma of pulmonary tuberculosis among adults with severe mental illness in Beijing, China
- Li Wang†1,
- Zhiguo Zhang†1,
- Qiuli Yan†2,
- Jie Lu3,
- Baoyin Gao2,
- Yanlin Zhao5 and
- Yu Pang4, 5Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 May 2016
Accepted: 5 January 2017
Published: 18 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Hanlon|
|15 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Li Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charlotte Hanlon|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Li Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12879-017-2190-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.