Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Infectious Diseases

Fig. 2

From: Development of an algorithm for phenotypic screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the routine laboratory

Fig. 2

Comparison of characteristics of single or combined tests compared to imipenem non-susceptible clinical category (x, imipenem 24) by using likelihood ratio graphs: Ticarcillin/clavulanate 24; Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15; ▲ Piperacillin/tazobactam 21; ∆ Piperacillin/tazobactam 16; ■ Meropenem 22; Meropenem 25; Meropenem 27; ❏ Doripenem; Temocillin 8; ♦ Temocillin 12; Temocillin 15; Cefepime 24; Cefepime 26; Temocillin 12 & Piperacillin/tazobactam 16 [14]; Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15; Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Imipenem 22/Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Meropenem 22; Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Imipenem 22 and Cefepime 26 for AmpC producers/Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Meropenem 22 and Cefepime 26 for AmpC producers; Temocillin 11 & Rosco KPC-MBL confirm kit [15]; ❖ Temocillin 8 & Rosco KPC-MBL confirm kit [13]; □ Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Meropenem 22 & Meropenem 32 on Mueller-Hinton-cloxacillin for AmpC producers; Temocillin 15 & Ticarcillin/clavulanate 15 & Meropenem 22 and Cefepime 26 & Meropenem 32 on Mueller-Hinton-cloxacillin for AmpC producers

Back to article page