Skip to main content

Table 2 Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence in the general population and potential determinants for HEV seropositivity

From: Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence among the general population in a livestock-dense area in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional population-based serological survey

Determinants

N

Seroprevalence (%)a

Crude ORb

[95% CI]c

Adjusted ORb,d,e

[95% CI]c

Age (years)

 20–30

50

10.0

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 30–40

179

15.1

1.60

[0.58–4.39]

1.49

[0.54–4.13]

 40–50

432

19.2

2.14

[0.82–5.55]

2.01

[0.77–5.26]

 50–60

661

25.1

3.02

[1.18–7.72]

2.58

[1.00–6.70]

 60–70

938

37.5

5.40

[2.13–13.73]

4.22

[1.63–10.91]

  > =70

162

38.3

5.58

[2.10–14.80]

4.15

[1.53–11.24]

Gender

 Female

1,318

25.6

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Male

1,104

32.3

1.39

[1.16–1.65]

1.21

[1.00–1.47]

Educational level

 High

733

24.8

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Medium

1,080

26.9

1.12

[0.90–1.38]

1.10

[0.87–1.38]

 Low

609

36.5

1.74

[1.37–2.20]

1.36

[1.04–1.76]

Diet without pork meat

 No

2,360

28.8

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Yes

47

19.2

0.59

[0.28–1.22]

0.72

[0.33–1.59]

  Missing

15

     

Ever smoked

 No

1,034

26.5

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Yes

1,388

30.3

1.21

[1.01–1.45]

0.96

[0.79–1.17]

Childhood in study region

 No

580

32.2

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Yes

1,816

27.4

0.79

[0.65–0.97]

0.85

[0.68–1.07]

  Missing

26

     

Childhood on pig farm

 No

1,928

27.6

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Yes

468

32.5

1.26

[1.02–1.57]

1.21

[0.94–1.55]

  Missing

26

     

Performed jobs on farm during childhood

 No

1,090

26.9

Ref.

-

Ref.

 

 Yes

1,220

29.7

1.15

[0.96–1.38]

1.02

[0.83–1.27]

  Missing

112

     

Number of pigs within 1000 m of residential address (tertiles)

 Lowf

807

32.1

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Intermediateg

808

26.9

0.78

[0.63–0.96]

0.79

[0.63–0.99]

 Highh

807

27.1

0.79

[0.64–0.98]

0.83

[0.66–1.04]

  1. aIncluding both positive and borderline samples (anti-HEV IgG ratio > = 0.90)
  2. bOdds Ratio
  3. c95% Confidence Interval
  4. dORs are adjusted for age, gender, educational level, diet without pork meat, ever smoked, childhood in study region, childhood on pig farm, jobs on farm during childhood and number of pigs within 1000 m of residential address
  5. eAdjusted ORs and 95% CIs were calculated for cases without missing answers (N = 2,301)
  6. fNumber of pigs within 1000 m < = 1,003
  7. gNumber of pigs within 1000 m > 1,003 and < = 5,771
  8. hNumber of pigs within 1000 m > 5,771