Skip to main content

Table 1 Prevalence and Factors Associated with Toxoplasma gondii Infection

From: Seroprevalence and determinants of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at the university teaching hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

 

UNIVARITE ANALYSIS

MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS

Characteristics

Response (%) n

Prevalence (%), category total (n)

OR

95% CI

P-VALUE

OR

95% CI

P-VALUE

SOCIO-DEMOGRAHIC

AGE IN YEARS

 15-24

(18.7) 77

11.7 (77)

3.11

1.21-7.96

0.02

0.11

0.00-7.41

0.30

 25-34

(59.6) 245

4.08 (245)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

 35-49

(21.7) 89

5.62 (89)

1.40

0.46-4.21

0.55

1.91

0.25-14.7

0.53

LEVEL OF EDUCATION

 Up to secondary*

(51.7) 209

6.22 (209)

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.60

0.10-3.57

0.57

 Tertiary

(48.3) 195

4.62 (195)

0.73

0.30-1.75

0.48

1.00

1.00

1.00

MARITAL STATUS

 Married

(88.3) 361

4.99 (361)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.46

0.01-271

0.89

 Never been married

(5.38) 22

18.2 (22)

3.46

1.08-11.1

0.04

10.9

0.06-1955

0.37

 Divorced/Widowed

(6.36) 26

7.69 (26)

1.91

0.41-8.79

0.41

1.00

1.00

1.00

EMPLOYED

 In Employment

(62.7) 257

       

 Unemployed

(37.3) 153

       

EMPLOYMENT TYPE

 Farming and construction

(2.7) 7

28.6 (7)

8.97

1.47-54.6

0.02

15.5

0.23-1019

0.20

 Professional/Administrative

(63.6) 164

6.90 (87)

1.66

0.54-5.11

0.38

0.71

0.08-6.02

0.75

 Trading/other businesses

(33.7) 87

4.27 (164)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

INCOME

 Below K3000

(37.6) 94

10.64 (94)

3.13

0.95-10.3

0.06

   

 Between K3000 and K5000

(43.6) 109

3.67 (109)

1.0

1.00

1.00

   

 Above K5000

(18.8) 47

2.13 (47)

0.57

0.06-5.25

0.62

   

RESIDENCE

 High cost residential area

(18.5) 76

3.95 (76)

0.94

0.23-0.13

0.93

2.84

0.20-39.3

0.44

 Medium cost residential area

(39.2) 161

3.73 (161)

2.30

0.64-8.18

0.20

0.40

0.03-5.77

0.50

 Low cost residential area

(42.3) 174

8.62 (174)

1.0

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

OBSTETRICAL FACTORS

GESTATIONAL AGE

 First Trimester

(20.5) 84

3.57 (84)

0.68

0.18-2.53

0.56

   

 Second Trimester

(32.6) 134

8.21 (134)

1.64

0.68-4.00

0.28

   

 Third Trimester

(47.0) 192

5.18 (193)

1.0

1.00

1.00

   

PARITY

 No child (first pregnancy)

(64.5) 262

4.62 (262)

1.77

0.23-13.9

0.59

   

 One child

(29.3) 119

9.09 (119)

0.83

0.09-7.80

0.87

   

 Two and above

(6.16) 25

3.47 (25)

1.0

1.00

1.00

   

BEHAVORIAL/LIFESTYLE FACTORS

CONTACT WITH CATS

 Yes

(10.0) 41

7.32 (41)

1.31

0.37-4.59

0.68

7.81

0.99-61.8

0.05

 No

(90.0) 369

5.69 (369)

1.0

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

CONTACT WITH DOGS

 Yes

(22.2) 91

6.59 (91)

1.18

0.45-3.07

0.73

   

 No

(77.8) 319

5.64 (319)

1.00

1.00

1.00

   

EATING MEAT

 Yes

(97.6) 401

5.99 (401)

1.00

1.00

1.00

   

 No

(2.43) 10

0 (10)

2.65*10-06

0

0.99

   

LENGTH OF COOKING MEET

 Under 30 min

(12.6) 49

4.08 (49)

0.62

0.14-2.82

0.54

   

 Within 30 to 60 min

(55.9) 218

6.42 (218)

1.00

1.00

1.00

   

 Within 60 to 120 min

(18.0) 70

4.29 (70)

0.65

0.18-2.34

0.51

   

 Over 120 min

(13.6) 53

3.77 (53)

0.57

0.13-2.60

0.47

   

EATING CURED MEAT

 Yes

(87.0) 347

5.19 (347)

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

0.02-43.6

1.00

 No

(13.0) 52

11.5 (52)

2.38

0.90-6.32

0.08

1.00

1.00

1.00

EATING RAW VEGETABLES

 Yes

(81.3) 334

5.69 (334)

1.00

1.00

1.00

   

 No

(18.7) 77

6.49 (77)

1.15

−4160-0.04

0.79

   

DRINKING UNPASTEURIZED MILK

 Yes

(8.76) 36

8.33 (36)

1.53

0.43-5.41

0.51

   

 No

(91.2) 375

5.60 (375)

1.00

1.00

1.00

   

CO-INFECTION

HIV STATUS

 Positive

(16.8) 69

8.70 (69)

1.69

0.65-4.43

0.28

0.39

0.04-3.47

0.40

 Negative

(82.2) 338

5.33 (338)

1.0

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

  1. Associations were calculated with Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact test where appropriate, whereas GLM for binary outcome reporting odds ratios was used for the univariate analysis
  2. * = the category ‘two and above’ was created because the participants who had three to eight (maximum) children were few hence were not very comparable
  3. Variables, ‘eating meat’, parity, ‘length of cooking meat’, ‘drinking unpasteurised milk’ and income were omitted in the final model due to their small numbers