This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
False Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing
- Yanal M. Murad†1, 2Email author,
- Justo Perez†1,
- Gustavo Ybazeta1,
- Sarah Mavin2,
- Sebastien Lefebvre1,
- J. Scott Weese4,
- Joyce Rousseau4,
- Francisco Diaz-Mitoma†1, 2, 3 and
- Reza Nokhbeh†1, 2Email author
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 12 October 2015
Accepted: 29 July 2016
Published: 19 August 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Verhoeven|
|3 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Briony Elliott|
|15 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yanal Murad|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Verhoeven|
|27 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yanal Murad|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Aug 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12879-016-1741-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.