Skip to main content

Table 4 Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios and 95 % confidence intervals associated with couples’ HCT uptake among married or cohabiting individuals with no prior couples’ HCT in Rakai, Uganda

From: Evaluation of a demand-creation intervention for couples’ HIV testing services among married or cohabiting individuals in Rakai, Uganda: a cluster-randomized intervention trial

Variable Unadjusted Prevalence Ratio (PR) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) Adjusted PR and 95 % CIa
Study arm
 Comparison 1.00 1.00
 Intervention 1.33 (0.83, 2.12) 1.43 (1.02, 2.01)
Sex
 Female 1.00 1.00
 Male 1.22 (o.89, 1.67) 1.41 (1.00, 1.98)
Marital duration
 <=2 years 1.00 1.00
 3–4 years 1.10 (0.56, 2.17) 1.19 (0.60, 2.34)
 5+ years 0.80 (0.44, 1.45) 0.79 (0.44, 1.42)
No. of sexual partners in past year
 1 1.00 1.00
 2+ 0.71 (0.47, 1.07) 0.46 (0.27, 0.78)
Condom use in the past year
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 1.25 (0.88, 1.78) 1.87 (1.25, 2.79)
Current non-marital sex
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.69 (0.43, 1.10) 0.68 (0.40, 1.17)
Prior Mutual HIV disclosure (at baseline)
 Neither disclosed 1.00 1.00
 Only disclosed 1.23 (0.78, 1.94) 1.23 (0.78, 1.94)
 Both disclosed 2.01 (1.29, 3.12) 1.99 (1.36, 2.91)
HIV status at baseline
 HIV-positive 1.00 1.00
 HIV-negative 1.63 (0.82, 3.22) 1.56 (0.80, 3.04)
 HIV status not available 1.46 (0.57, 3.75) 1.38 (0.56, 3.41)
  1. aAdjusted for sex, marital duration, prior HIV status disclosure (at baseline), number of sexual partners in the past 12 months; condom use in the past 12 months, current non-marital sexual relationships and HIV status at baseline