Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with CD4+ T cell count and viral load

From: Association between different anti-Tat antibody isotypes and HIV disease progression: data from an African cohort

Associationa of duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat antibody isotype with CD4+ T cell counts (n = 88)

     

Univariate

  

Multivariate

 

Covariate

Stratum

n

Mean CD4+ T cells count (cells/μL)

IRR

95 % conf.int.

p-value

IRR

95 % conf.int.

p-value

HIV infection (years)

>3

69

403

1

–

–

1

–

–

≤3

19

501

1.24

(0.98 to 1.58)

0.079

1.10

(0.86 to 1.41)

0.443

IgG

neg.

48

431

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

40

415

0.96

(0.76 to 1.22)

0.764

0.97

(0.77 to 1.21)

0.761

IgM

neg.

43

353

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

45

491

1.39

(1.10 to 1.76)

0.007

1.34

(1.05 to 1.71)

0.019

IgA

neg.

73

448

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

15

306

0.68

(0.51 to 0.91)

0.010

0.73

(0.55 to 0.95)

0.020

Associationa of duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat antibody isotype with Log10 VL (n = 83)

     

Univariate

  

Multivariate

 

Covariate

Stratum

n

Mean viral load (Log10 copies/ml)

IRR

95 % conf.int.

p- value

IRR

95 % conf.int.

p-value

HIV infection (years)

>3

65

4.68

1

–

–

1

–

–

≤3

18

4.26

0.91

(0.79 to 1.05)

0.203

0.96

(0.83 to 1.10)

0.553

IgG

neg.

45

4.47

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

38

4.74

1.06

(0.96 to 1.16)

0.230

1.05

(0.96 to 1.15)

0.284

IgM

neg.

40

4.84

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

43

4.36

0.90

(0.82 to 0.99)

0.027

0.92

(0.85 to 0.99)

0.037

IgA

neg.

68

4.46

1

–

–

1

–

–

pos.

15

5.20

1.17

(1.08 to 1.26)

<0.001

1.13

(1.06 to 1.21)

<0.001

  1. IRR incidence rate ratio
  2. aPoisson regression with robust variance estimates was used to examine the association of Tat antibody isotypes with CD4+ T cell count and viral load. The table shows that the duration of HIV infection and anti-Tat IgG positivity had no significant influence on both parameters, whereas the presence of anti-Tat IgM and IgA were significantly associated with CD4+ T cell count and viral load. Anti-Tat IgM positivity was associated with higher CD4+ T cell counts and lower viral loads, whereas anti-Tat IgA positivity showed the opposite pattern. The fact that multivariate IRRs and p-values for both parameters are fairly similar to the univariate estimates suggest that these associations are independent of each other