Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Infectious Diseases

Fig. 3

From: Association between different anti-Tat antibody isotypes and HIV disease progression: data from an African cohort

Fig. 3

Association of anti-Tat antibody isotypes with immunological abnormalities. a Subjects were stratified according to the activation burden. Subjects in panels (b-d) were stratified according to the type and number of anti-Tat antibody isotypes. b Subgroups were compared for CD4:CD8 ratio. c Subgroups were compared for percentages of CD38+ HLA-DR+ on CD8+ (left panel) and CD4+ T cells (right panel). d Subgroups were compared for CD8+ (left panel) and CD4+ (right panel) T cell subpopulations. Solid lines in panels (b-c) represent the median value while bars in panel (d) represent the median values with interquartile range. Statistical comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact probability test (a) and Mann-Whitney test (b-d)

Back to article page

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us