Skip to main content

Table 1 Compared results by MALDI-TOF MS analysis using the new and the standard identification methods

From: MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a potential tool for Trichomonas vaginalis identification

 

MALDI-TOF MS analysis

 

New identification method

Standard identification method

 

Range setting (6–10 kDa)

Range setting (3–15 kDa)

Clinical isolates

Identification

Score

Identification

Score

Tv1a

T. vaginalis G3

2.0

T. vaginalis G3

1.9

Tv2a

T. vaginalis G3

2.2

T. vaginalis G3

1.9

Tv3a

T. vaginalis G3

2.1

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

Tv4a

T. vaginalis G3

2.1

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

Tv5a

T. vaginalis G3

2.3

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

Tv6a

T. vaginalis G3

2.2

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

Tv7a

T. vaginalis G3

2.2

No identification

NA

Tv8a

T. vaginalis G3

2.1

No identification

NA

Tv9a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv10a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv11a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv12a

T. vaginalis G3

1.9

No identification

NA

Tv13a

T. vaginalis G3

1.8

No identification

NA

Tv14a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv15a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv16a

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Tv17a

T. vaginalis G3

2.0

No identification

NA

Tv18a

T. vaginalis G3

2.0

No identification

NA

Tv19a

T. vaginalis G3

2.0

No identification

NA

Tv20b

T. vaginalis G3

2.0

No identification

NA

Tv21c

T. vaginalis G3

1.7

No identification

NA

Samples

    

Urine N. 20

No identification

NA

No identification

NA

Vaginal swabd

No identification

NA

No identification

NA

Urethral swabd

No identification

NA

No identification

NA

Urine swabd

No identification

NA

No identification

NA

  1. Tv Trichomonas vaginalis, NA not applicable
  2. aisolated from vaginal swab
  3. bisolated from urine
  4. cisolated from urethral swab
  5. dexperimentally seeded sample with Tv15