Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality assessment of included case control studies

From: The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author Year

Design

RoB_P

CrA_P

RoB_I

CrA_I

RoB_RS

CrA_RS

RoB_TaF

Ang 2011

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Ang 2012

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Bergstrom 1991

Case control

High

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Branda 2013

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Cerar 2006

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

High

Cerar 2010

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Christova 2003

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Cinco 2006

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Dessau 2010

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Dessau 2013

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Flisiak 1996

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

High

Flisiak 1998

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

High

Goettner 2005

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High

High

Low

High

Goossens 2000

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Goossens 2001

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Gueglio 1996

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Hansen 1988

Case control

High

High

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Hansen 1989

Case control

High

High

High

High

Low

Low

High

Hansen 1991

Case control

High

High

High

Low

Low

Low

High

Hernandez 2003

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Hofmann 1990

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Hofmann 1996

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Hofstad 1987

Case control

High

High

High

High

Low

Low

High

Hunfeld 2002

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Jovivic 2003

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High

Unclear

Low

High

Kaiser 1998

Case control

High

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Kaiser 1999inf

Case control

High

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Karlsson 1989eur

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High

Low

Low

High

Karlsson 1989siid

Case control

High

High

High

High

Low

Low

High

Lahdenne 2003

Case control

High

High

High

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Lakos 2005

Case control

High

High

Low

High/Low*

High

Low

High

Lange 1991

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High/Low*

Unclear

Low

High

Lencakova 2008

Case control

High

High

Low/Unclear*

High/Low*

Unclear

Low

High

Marangoni 2005jmm

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

High

Marangoni 2005new

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low*

Low

Low

High

Marangoni 2008

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Unclear**

Unclear

Low

High

Mathiesen 1996

Case control

High

High

High/Low*

High/Low*

High

Low

High

Mathiesen 1998

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High/Low*

Low

Low

High

Nicolini 1992

Case control

High

High

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Nohlmans 1994

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High/Low*

Unclear

Low

High

Oksi 1995

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High/Low*

Unclear

Low

High

Olsson 1991

Case control

High

High

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Panelius 2001

Case control

High

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Putzker 1995

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Rauer 1995

Case control

High

High

High

High

High

Low

High

Reiber 2013

Case control

High

High

High

Unclear

Low

Low

High

Rijpkema 1994

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High/Low*

Unclear

Low

High

Ruzic 2002

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Ryffel 1998

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High

High

Low

High

Schulte 2004

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High

High

Low

High

Smismans 2006

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Tjernberg 2007

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low/Unclear*

High

Low

High

Tjernberg 2011

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

VanBurgel 2011

Case control

High

High

Unclear

Low

High

Low

High

Wilske 1993

Case control

High

High

High/Unclear*

High/Low*

High

Low

High

Wilske 1999

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High

High

Low

High

Zoller 1990

Case control

High

High

Unclear

High

Unclear

Low

High

  1. RoB_P: Risk of Bias in patient sampling; RoB_I: Risk of Bias in Index test; RoB_RS: Risk of Bias in Reference Standard; RoB_TaF: Risk of Bias in timing and flow. CrA_P: Concerns regarding applicability of patient sample; CrA_I: Concerns regarding applicability of Index Test; CrA_RS: Concerns regarding applicability of Reference Standard. * some studies evaluated more than one test and evaluated these in different ways (e.g. for one test the cut-off value was pre-specified, while for the other test it was based on the results)