The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexia Belperron|
|6 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Norris|
|18 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Mariska Leeflang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Norris|
|5 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexia Belperron|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|25 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12879-016-1468-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.