| |
Routine systematic testing
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
van Liere et al. [10]
|
STI clinic, South Limburg, Netherlands ’12–‘13
|
All
|
654
|
8.4 % (55/654)
|
31.0 % @6 (203/654)
|
69.0 % @6 (451/654)
|
7.9 % (16/203)
|
8.6 % (39/451)
|
11.2 % (73/654)
|
11.6 % (76/654)
|
3.9 % (3/76)
|
5.4 % (3/55)
|
|
Van Liere et al. [11]
|
STI clinic, South Limburg, Netherlands ’10–‘12
|
Swingers
|
461
|
6.7 % (31/461)
|
29.5 % @6 (136/461)
|
70.5 % @6 (325/461)
|
3.5 % (16/136)
|
4.6 % (15/325)
|
6.3 % (29/461)
|
7.8 % (36/461)
|
19.4 % (7/36)
|
22.6 % (7/31)
|
|
Peters et al. [12]
|
Primary health care facilities South Africa ’11–‘12
|
All
|
603
|
7.1 % (43/603)
|
4.3 % @6 (26/603)
|
95.7 % @6 (577/603)
|
3.8 % (1/26)
|
7.3 % (42/577)
|
16.0 % (96/603)
|
17.7 % (107/603)
|
10.3 % (11/107)
|
25.6 % (11/43)
|
|
Ostergaard et al. [27]
|
STI clinic, Denmark ’95–‘96
|
All
|
196
|
5.6 % (11/196)
|
43.9 % @e (86/196)
|
56.1 % @e (110/196)
|
4.7 % (4/86)
|
6.4 % (7/110)
|
14.5 % (25/173)
|
15.6 % (27/173)
|
7.4 % (2/27)
|
18.2 % (2/11)
|
| |
Testing on indication of RAI
| | | | | | | | | |
|
Trebach et al. [28]
|
2 public health STI clinics, Baltimore, USA ’11–‘13
|
Had RAI, sharing toys
|
602
|
8.6 % (52/602)
|
100 % @3
|
0%
|
8.6 % (52/602)
|
N/A
|
9.4 % (50/532)
|
11.8 % (63/532)
|
25.4 % (13/63)
|
26.0 % (13/50)
|
|
Bachmann et al. [24]
|
STI clinics, hospital-based HIV clinics, USA ’03–‘07
|
Had RAI, STD contact
|
99
|
27.3 % (27/99)
|
40.4 % @2 (40/99)
|
59.6 % @2 (59/99)
|
17.5b % (7/40)
|
33.9 % (20/59)
|
23.2 % (23/99)
|
30.3 % (30/99)
|
23.3 % (7/30)
|
25.9 % (7/27)
|
|
Van der Helm et al. [25]
|
STI clinics, Amsterdam, South Limburg, Netherlands, ’06–‘07
|
Had RAI
|
901
|
9.3 % (84/901)
|
100 % @6
|
0 %
|
9.3 % (84/901)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Sethupathi et al. [19]
|
STI clinic Singleton hospital, UK ’06–‘08
|
Had RAI, STD contact, symptoms, assault
|
160
|
12.5 % (20/160)
|
51.2 % @u (82/160)
|
48.8 % @u (78/160)
|
12.2 % (10/82)
|
12.8 % (10/78)
|
14.1 % (22/156)
|
14.7 % (23/156)
|
4.3 % (1/23)
|
5.0 % (1/20)
|
|
Koedijk et al. [18]
|
STI clinics Netherlands ’06–‘10
|
Had RAI, symptoms, prostitution
|
18,238
|
9.3 % (1695/18,238)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
9.4 % (1709/18,238)
|
11.7 % (2139/18,238)
|
20.1 % (430/2139)
|
25.4 % (430/1695)
|
|
Hunte et al. [16]
|
STI clinic Miami USA ‘07
|
Had RAI
|
97
|
17.5 % (17/97)
|
100 % @3
|
0 %
|
17.5 % (17/97)
|
N/A
|
16.5 % (16/97)
|
17.5 % (17/97)
|
5.9 % (1/17)
|
5.9 % (1/17)
|
|
Peters et al. [22]
|
STI clinic, The Hague, Netherlands,’07–‘08
|
Had RAI
|
850
|
8.8 % (75/850)
|
100 % @6
|
0 %
|
8.8 % (75/850)
|
N/A
|
8.9 % (76/850)
|
10.8 % (92/850)
|
20.7 % (16/92)
|
21.3 % (16/75)
|
|
Javanbakt et al. [17]
|
STI clinics USA ’08–‘10
|
Had RAI
|
1203
|
14.6 % (171/1203)
|
100 % @3
|
0 %
|
14.6 % (171/1203)
|
N/A
|
12.0 % (144/1203)
|
16.0 % (193/1203)
|
25.4 % (49/193)
|
28.7 % (49/171)
|
|
Shaw et al. [23]
|
STI clinic UK, before ‘13
|
Had RAI
|
312
|
7.1 % (22/312)
|
100 % @u
|
0 %
|
7.1 % (22/312)
|
N/A
|
6.7 % (194/3043)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
22.7 % (5/22)
|
|
Cosentino et al. [29]
|
STI clinic Health department; HIV clinic, Pittsburgh, USA ’09–‘10
|
Had RAI
|
272
|
7.7 % (21/272)
|
100 % @e
|
0 %
|
7.7 % (21/272)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Garner et al. [15]
|
Manchester Centre for Sexual Health, UK ‘10
|
Had RAI
|
91
|
6.6 % (6/91)
|
100 % @u
|
0 %
|
6.6 % (6/91)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
9.4 % (59/631)
|
N/A
|
16.7 % (1/6)
|
|
Bazan et al. [13]
|
Student health clinic Seattle, before ‘93
|
Had RAI
|
341
|
13.5 % (46/341)
|
100 % @12
|
0 %
|
13.5 % (46/341)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
14.7 % (49/334)
|
12.2 % (6/49)
|
13.6 % (6/44)
|
| |
Testing on indication of genital CT
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ding et al. [26]
|
STI clinic Plymouth, UK ’12–‘13
|
Had genital CT
|
97
|
77.3 % (75/97)
|
25.8 % @u (25/97)
|
74.2 % @u (72/97)
|
80.0 % (20/25)
|
76.4 % (55/72)
|
100 %
|
100 %
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Musil et al. [30]
|
Canberra Sexual Health Centre, Australia ’13–’14
|
Had genital CT, contact, symptoms
|
56
|
57.1 % (32/56)
|
33.9 % @6 (19/56)
|
66.1 % @6 (37/56)
|
57.9 % (11/19)
|
56.8 % (21/37)
|
76.8 % (43/56)
|
78.6 % (44/56)
|
2.3 % (1/44)
|
3.1 % (1/32)
|
| |
Testing on indication of Pelvic examination (PE)
| | | | | | | | |
|
Gratrix et al. [21]
|
STI clinic, Calgary, Canada ‘12
|
Received PE
|
1570
|
11.7 % (183/1570)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.1 % (110/1543)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Gratrix et al. [21]
|
STI clinic, Edmonton, Canada. ‘12
|
Received PE
|
1485
|
13.5 % (201/1485)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
12.6 % (177/1403)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Barry et al. [20]
|
STI clinic, San Francisco, USA, 07–‘08
|
Received PE
|
1308
|
5.1 % (67/1308)
|
21.8 % @3 (256/1173)
|
78.2 % @3 (917/1173)
|
4.3 % (11/256)
|
4.8 % (44/917)
|
5.9 % (76/1308)
|
6.7 % (88/1308)
|
15.9 % (14/88)
|
21.8 % (14/67)
|
| |
Self-triage Internet
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ladd et al. [14]
|
Internet iwantthekit.org, USA ’09–‘11
|
Self-request
|
205
|
12.7 % (26/205)
|
57.5 % @3 (118/205)
|
42.5 % @3 (87/205)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
17.6 % (35/201)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
| |
Peer-intervention (social network)
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Dukers-Muijrers et al. [31]
|
‘Open population’ South Limburg Netherlands, ’13–14
|
Test provided by a friend (social network)
|
58
|
6.9 % (4/58)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6.9 % (4/58)
|
8.6 % (5/58)
|
20.0 % (1/5)
|
25.0 % (1/4)
|
