Skip to main content

Table 3 Incremental economic outcomes for different OPV cessation timing options compared to the current timing plan based on vaccination costs and expected paralytic polio cases between 2015 and 2019

From: Health and economic consequences of different options for timing the coordinated global cessation of the three oral poliovirus vaccine serotypes

Alternative

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratioa

Incremental net benefits ($)

LOW

LMI

UMI

HIGH

LOW

LMI

UMI

HIGH

All

OPV23 cessation in 2017

CLS

CLS

CLS

CLS

0.3

3.0

2.7

1.3

7.3

OPV123 cessation in 2018

CLS

CLS

CLS

1.9

300

660

190

−8.6

1,100

OPV123 cessation in 2019

Dominated

Dominated

Dominated

Dominated

−0.3

−2.6

−1.6

0

−4.6

OPV123 cessation in 2019 with tOPV-only from 2017

Dominated

Dominated

Dominated

Dominated

−0.3

−2.5

−1.6

0

−4.5

OPV123 cessation in 2019 with IPV added from 2018

CSLC

CSLC

CSLC

Dominated

110

370

380

0

860

  1. Abbreviations: HIGH, high-income; IPV, inactivated poliovirus vaccine; LMI, lower middle-income; LOW, low-income; OPV, oral poliovirus vaccine; OPV(##) cessation, globally-coordinated cessation of OPV containing the serotype(s) indicated by ##; UMI, upper middle-income; $, 2013 United States dollar
  2. aNumbers represent millions of $ per disability-adjusted life-year averted; Letters are: CLS, cost and life-saving (i.e., negative incremental costs and positive cases prevented); CSLC cost-saving but life-costing (i.e., positive incremental costs and negative cases prevented); Dominated, positive incremental costs and negative cases prevented