This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Impact of infection control activities on the rate of needle stick injuries at a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan over a period of six years: an observational study
© Zafar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 20 January 2009
Accepted: 29 May 2009
Published: 29 May 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Jan 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Rogues|
|2 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - alpay azap|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Mar 2009||Author responded||Author comments - AFIA ZAFAR|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Mar 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - AFIA ZAFAR|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Marie Rogues|
|13 May 2009||Author responded||Author comments - AFIA ZAFAR|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|13 May 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 May 2009||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-9-78|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.