Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Fluoroquinolone resistance during 2000–2005 : An observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Po-Ren Hsueh
6 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Drago
15 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Blondeau
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sheehan
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorenzo Drago
6 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Blondeau
13 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Po-Ren Hsueh
11 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sheehan
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Blondeau
7 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sheehan
Resubmission - Version 5
7 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Paul Sheehan
Resubmission - Version 6
20 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 May 2008 Editorially accepted
24 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-8-71

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement