Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ability of online drug databases to assist in clinical decision-making with infectious disease therapies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 May 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Taylor
18 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Smith
17 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Smith
30 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
7 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hyla Polen
Resubmission - Version 9
7 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
6 Nov 2008 Editorially accepted
6 Nov 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-8-153

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement