Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative efficacies of different antibiotic treatments to eradicate nontypeable Haemophilus influenzaeinfection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Aug 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arnold Smith
16 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Gilsdorf
15 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Hidenori Matsui
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janet Gilsdorf
7 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hidenori Matsui
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Hidenori Matsui
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Feb 2008 Editorially accepted
7 Feb 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-8-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement