Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for:

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Sep 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manuel Romero-Gómez
21 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierluigi Toniutto
5 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Charles Berenson
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierluigi Toniutto
26 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Charles Berenson
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Charles Berenson
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Charles Berenson
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Feb 2007 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-7-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement