Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Empirical use of antibiotics and adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapies in a university hospital: a prospective observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 May 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Andrew Seaton
5 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Curtis Donskey
31 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Stefano Bassetti
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Andrew Seaton
3 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Stefano Bassetti
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Andrew Seaton
22 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stefano Bassetti
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stefano Bassetti
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Stefano Bassetti
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
26 Mar 2007 Editorially accepted
26 Mar 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-7-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement