Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessment of routine surveillance data as a tool to investigate measles outbreaks in Mozambique

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jagrati Jani
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Cliff
6 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rick Speare
21 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jagrati Jani
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Cliff
13 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jagrati Jani
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jagrati Jani
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Feb 2006 Editorially accepted
21 Feb 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-6-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement