650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively). Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others."/> 650 IU/L (OR 6.4, 23.8 and 4.7 respectively). Clinical and epidemiological factors can help us to explain why transmission was observed in some instances but not in others."/>
Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical and epidemiological predictors of transmission in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jan 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabriel Leung
3 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wuchun Cao
24 May 2006 Author responded Author comments - Mark Chen
Resubmission - Version 2
24 May 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabriel Leung
7 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wuchun Cao
18 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Mark Chen
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Mark Chen
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Mark Chen
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Oct 2006 Editorially accepted
18 Oct 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-6-151

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement