Skip to main content

Table 1 Antimicrobial susceptibilities (%) of Proteus mirabilis by study year, 2002-2012

From: Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Proteus mirabilis: a longitudinal nationwide study from the Taiwan surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (TSAR) program

Antimicrobial agentsa

2002 (n = 176)

2004 (n = 186)

2006 (n = 205)

2008 (n = 219)

2010 (n = 185)

2012 (n = 186)

P b

total (n = 1157)

β-lactams:

        

  Amoxicillin/CAc

91.4

74.7

86.8

83.6

NT

NT

 

84.6

  Ampicillin

33.3

32.3

31.7

39.3

NT

NT

 

34.3

  Aztreonam_2009

99.4

99.5

98.5

100

100

99.5

 

99.5

  Aztreonam

99.4

98.9

98.5

100

100

98.9

 

99.3

  Cefazolin_2009

73.6

64.0

74.2

75.3

NT

NT

 

71.9 d

  Cefazolin

0.6

0

2.4

0.5

NT

NT

 

0.9

  Cefuroxime

92.5

83.3

85.9

88.6

NT

NT

 

87.5

  Cefotaxime_2009

95.5

88.2

96.6

94.9

98.4

97.3

 

95.2

  Cefotaxime

92.6

84.4

86.8

88.5

80

81.7

0.003

85.7

  Ceftazidime_2009

100

99.5

99

98.2

97.8

95.7

0.001

98.4

  Ceftazidime

100

98.4

98.1

96.4

95.6

95.2

0.001

97.2

  Cefoxitin

96

94.1

94.6

95

NT

NT

 

94.9

  Cefepime

97.2

91.4

97.6

99.1

100

98.9

 

97.4e

  Ertapenem_2009

NT

NT

NT

NT

100

100

 

100

  Ertapenem

NT

NT

NT

NT

100

99.5

 

99.7

  Imipenem_2009

100

100

99.5

99.5

100

100

 

99.8 d

  Imipenem

34.7

16.1

56.6

43.4

92.4

67.2

 

51.7

  Meropenem

NT

NT

NT

NT

100

100

 

100

  Piperacillin

48.9

44.6

37.6

43.3

NT

NT

 

43.4

Non β-lactams:

        

  Amikacin

92.6

88.2

89.8

90.4

90.3

88.7

 

90

  Gentamicin

59.1

60.8

54.2

62.1

55.1

54.3

 

57.7

  Ciprofloxacin

80.1

70.3

68.3

69.9

70.3

53.8

< 0.001

68.7

  TMP/SMX (SXT)c

35.8

33.3

29.8

37

36.8

31.7

 

34.1

ESBL prevalence

5.1

10.2

10.7

6.9

5.4

10.8

 

8.2

AmpC prevalence

0

3.8

2.9

5.0

9.2

7.0

< 0.001

4.7

  1. aSusceptibility results are based on the current CLSI breakpoints [19]. For agents with breakpoint revision in recent years, results of the 2009 CLSI criteria are also shown for comparison [25].
  2. bChi-square for trends. Only statistically significant results are shown.
  3. cAmox/CA, Amoxacillin/clavulanic acid; TMP/SMX (SXT), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
  4. dItalicized, significant difference (P < 0.001) in susceptibility rates using old and revised breakpoints.
  5. eCefepime results include 3.5 % (41 isolates) in the SDD (susceptible dose dependent) category.