Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of different detection algorithms with sensitivity of 100% to detect influenza (UrgIndex-hospitalisation and ICD10-consultations), excluding data from 2009-S19 to 2010-S18

From: Can epidemic detection systems at the hospital level complement regional surveillance networks: Case study with the influenza epidemic?

Time series

Detection algorithms

Outbreaks periods

Non-epidemic periods

  

Mean timeliness (days)

Number of days with false alarms N = 793

Specificity (%)

UrgIndex - hospitalisations

C2, k = 0.08, 1d

3.7

149

81.2

C2, k = 0.08, 3d

8.7

75

90.5

C2, k = 0.1, 1d

3.7

120

84.9

C2, k = 0.1, 3d

14.3

56

92.9

C3, k = 0.08, 1d

−10.7

560

29.4

C3, k = 0.08, 3d

−8.7

497

37.3

C3, k = 0.08, 5d

−6.7

446

43.8

C3, k = 0.1, 1d

−8.3

511

35.6

C3, k = 0.1, 3d

−6.3

440

44.5

C3, k = 0.1, 5d

−0.3

384

51.6

C3, k = 0.5, 1d

4.0

139

82.5

C3, k = 0.5, 3d

6.0

78

90.2

C3, k = 1, 1d

4.0

41

94.8

ICD10 – consultations

C1, k = 0.07, 1d

1.0

37

95.3

C1, k = 0.07, 3d

5.0

23

97.1

C1, k = 0.07, 5d

12.3

15

98.1

C1, k = 0.1, 1d

1.0

36

95.5

C1, k = 0.1, 3d

5.0

22

97.2

C1, k = 0.1, 5d

12.3

14

98.2

C2, k = 0.07, 1d

−1.7

34

95.7

C2, k = 0.07, 3d

24.7

26

96.7

C2, k = 0.07, 5d

26.7

18

97.7

C2, k = 0.1, 1d

6.7

30

96.2

C2, k = 0.1, 3d

25.0

22

97.2

C2, k = 0.1, 5d

27.0

14

98.2

C3, k = 0.07, 1d

−8.0

48

93.9

C3, k = 0.07, 3d

3.0

40

95.0

C3, k = 0.07, 5d

5.0

35

95.6

C3, k = 0.1, 1d

−8.0

46

94.2

C3, k = 0.1, 3d

3.0

36

95.5

C3, k = 0.1, 5d

5.0

31

96.1

 

C3, k = 0.5, 1d

8.3

26

96.7

  1. C1, C2, and C3 refer to the three different moving average calculations of CUSUM statistics (C1-mild, C2-medium, C3-ultra).
  2. k is the detectable difference to the mean used to the calculation of CUSUM statistics.
  3. Negative mean timeliness: first day signal before the outbreaks beginning, on average.
  4. Positive mean timeliness: first day signal after the outbreaks beginning, on average.