Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of Case Records and Case Series on Antibiotic Associated Enterocolitis considered to be caused by MRSA

From: A systematic review for pursuing the presence of antibiotic associated enterocolitis caused by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Reference

Year

Country

No. of patients

Prior exposure to antibiotics

Endoscopic findings c/w AAE

Gram staining or other microscopic findings

Presence of MRSA while excluding CDI

Comparison group

Toxin assay

Animal model

Response to the treatment

Judged to be different from TSS or food poisoning

Hori et al. [8].

1989

Japan

154

Somec

No

No

Somed

No

Yes (SEC, and TSST-1)

No

Yes

Some TSSs

McDonald et al. [23].

1982

Australia

10

Yes

Yes in 1 pt

Yes

Yes by CCFA cx and TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Christie et al. [24].

1988

USA

1

No

No

No

Yes by TAa

Yes

Yesb

No

Yes

Yes

Sakamoto et al. [25].

1990

Japan

1

Yes

Yes

No

Yes by TA

No

Negative TSST-1

No

Yes

Yes

Matsuo et al. [26].e

1991

Japan

34

Yes in 28

4 patients with autopsy findings

No

Yes by CCFA cx.

No

No

No

Yes

No

Nakashio et al. [27].

1991

Japan

1

No

No

No

Yesd

No

Yes (SEC and TSST-1)

No

No

Probably TSSf

Takeshima et al. [28].

1991

Japan

16

Yes

No

No

Yes by CCMA cx.

No

No

No

No

Yes

Ueda et al. [29].

1991

Japan

2

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH and cx of unknown methods.

No

Yes (SEA and TSST-1)

No

Yes

UC

Hanatani et al. [30].

1992

Japan

1

Yes

No

Yes

Yes by TA

No

Yes (TSST-1 coding gene)

No

Yes

Yes

Inamatsu et al. [31].

1992

Japan

32

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA and cx of unknown methods.

No

Yes (SE and TSST-1)

No

Yes

One pt might have had TSS

Masuda et al. [32].

1993

Japan

1

Yes

No

Yes

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Taylor et al. [33].

1993

UK

1

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA and cx of unknown methods.

No

Yes (SEA)

No

Yes

Yes

Takatera et al. [34].

1994

Japan

2

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Kuramoto et al. [35].

1996

Japan

16

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Watanabe et al. [36].

1996

Japan

9

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH and cx of unknown methods.

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Konishi et al. [37].

1997

Japan

31

Probablyg

No

No

Yes by cx of unknown methods.

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Sakai et al. [38].

1997

Japan

19

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH and cx of unknown methods.

Compared with CDI

No

No

No

Yes

Yoshida et al. [39].

1997

Japan

1

Yes

Autopsy findings c/w multiple ulcers with abscess. No pseudomembrane formation.

Yes

Yes by unknown methods.

No

Yes (SEC)

No

No

Yes

Schiller et al. [40].

1998

USA

1

Yes

No

Yes

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes with ineffectiveness of metronidazole.

Yes

Kimata et al. [22].

1999

Japan

1

No

No

No

Yes by GDH

No

Yes (SEC, TSST-1, and protease B)

No

Yes

Yes

Gravet et al. [41].

1999

France

104

Yes

No

No

Yes by CCFA and TA

Yesh

Yes (SEA, SED, LukE-LukDi)

No

Yes

Yes

Terada et al. [42].

2000

Japan

1

No

No

No

Yes by TA

No

Yes (TSST-1)

No

Yes

Yes

Watanabe et alj[43].

2001

Japan

13

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH and cx of unknown methods.

No

Yes (SEA, SEC and TSST-1)

No

No

Yes

Yanagi et al. [44].

2002

Japan

1

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH

No

Yes (SEC and TSST-1)

No

Yes

No

Igami et al. [45].

2002

Japan

13

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Lee et al. [46].

2003

S. Korea

1

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Fujita et al. [47].

2004

Japan

1

Yes

Autopsy findings c/w PC with cocci

Yes

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

No

Nok

Yoshida et al. [48].

2004

Japan

1

Yes

Yes

No

Yes by TA

No

No

No

No

Probably necrotizing enterocolitis with Fournier gangrene.

Froberg et al. [49].

2004

USA

1

Yes

Autopsy findings c/w PC

Yes. Also, PCR of pseudomembrane was positive for MRSA.

Positive TA

No

No

No

No

Yes

Rhee et al. [50].

2004

USA

1

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes (and no response to metronidazole)

Yes

Nishizawa et al. [51].

2005

Japan

1

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

No

Ackermann et all[52].

2005

Germany

25

Yes

No

No

Yes by CCFA cx and TA.

Compared with CDI.

Yes (SEA, SEB, SEC, and SED)

No

UC

No

McPherson et al. [53].

2005

UK

1

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Boyce et al. [54].

2005

USA

11

Yes

  

Yes by CCFA cx

Yes

Yes (SEA, SEB, and SED)

No

Yes

Yes

Asha et al. [55].

2006

UK

10

Yes

No

No

Yes by CCEY cx and TA.

Compared with CDI and C. perfringens infections.

Yes (SEA, SEC, SED and TSST-1)

No

UK

Yes

Kurabayashi et al. [56].

2007

Japan

1

Yes

No

Yes

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Nagao et al. [57].

2007

Japan

2

Yes

No

No

positive TA (A only) in cone case. Negative in the other.

No

No

No

Yes, and no response to metronidazole.

Yes

Flemming et al. [58].

2007

Germany

29

Yes

No

No

Yes by CCFA cx and TA

With CDI.

Yes (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE)

No

UC

Yes

Kotler et al. [59].

2007

USA

1

No

Yes

Yes (Gram stain of ileal tissue and transmission electron micrograph)

Yes by TA

No

Yes (SEB, SEC)

No

Yes

Co-existence of TSS and enterocolitis.

Shiraishi et al. [60].

2008

Japan

18

UC

No

No

Yes by TA

With CDI

No

No

Yes

Yes

Tamura et al. [61].

2008

Japan

10

Yes

No

No

Yes by GDH

With CDI

No

No

Yes

Yes

Dalal et al. [62].

2008

USA

2

Yes

No

Yes

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Lo et al. [63].

2009

USA

5

Yes

No

No

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Fujii et al. [64].

2010

Japan

1

UC

No

No

Yes by TA

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Kitahata Y et al. [65].

2011

Japan

1

Yes

Yes

No

Yes by GDH

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

  1. Abbreviations: MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, c/w consistent with, AAE antibiotic associated enterocolitis, CDI Clostridium difficile infection, TSS toxic shock syndrome, pt patient, CCFA cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar, cx culture, TA toxin assay, SEC staphylococcal enterotoxin C, TSST-1 toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, CCMA cycloserine-cefoxitin-mannitol ager, GDH glutamate dehydrogenase assay, SEA staphylococcal enterotoxin A, SE staphylococcal enterotoxins, SED staphylococcal enterotoxin D, SEB staphylococcal enterotoxin B, UC unclear, PC pseudomembranous colitis, CCEY cycloserine-cefoxitin egg yolk agar, SEE staphylococcal enterotoxin E
  2. a. There was no specification whether S. aureus in this article was indeed MRSA. However, the patient was treated with oral vancomycin, suggesting it was.
  3. b. Cytopathic effects (CPE) were seen both via intracellular growth of S. aureus and with cell-free supernatant, suggesting the presence of toxin in S. aureus from the case. CPEs were not seen both in control S. aureus and its supernatant.
  4. c. Among the patients identified, the analysis was done for the use of antibiotics in 30 cases.
  5. d. The article did refer to C. difficile but did not specify the methods to identify it.
  6. e. Seventeen out of 34 patients did have concurrent C. difficile infection.
  7. f. The patient developed septic shock with multiple organ failure, with identification of MRSA from multiple sites.
  8. g. All cases are postoperative. Although there was no specific reference on the use of antibiotics, most patients in Japan usually receive varieties of antibiotics routinely after surgery, particularly in 1980s and 90s.
  9. h. Randomly selected S. aureus isolates were used for comparison of toxin productions.
  10. i. LukE-LukD are one of staphylococcal leukotoxin family [66].
  11. j. It is possible that some patients in this paper might been described in reference 37 in duplicates.
  12. k. The patient died of shock and organ failure. The blood culture after the death grew MRSA.
  13. l. All isolates of S. aureus in this study was oxacillin susceptible.