This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The association of HPV-16 seropositivity and natural immunity to reinfection: insights from compartmental models
© Korostil et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 June 2012
Accepted: 25 January 2013
Published: 13 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Edelstein|
|18 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johannes Bogaards|
|28 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jit|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Igor Korostil|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Jit|
|19 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zoe Edelstein|
|20 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johannes Bogaards|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-83|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.