This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Communication interventions to improve adherence to infection control precautions: a randomised crossover trial
© Ong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 November 2011
Accepted: 8 November 2012
Published: 6 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hugo Sax|
|10 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiane Reichardt|
|22 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mei-Sing Ong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mei-Sing Ong|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-13-72|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.