Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies and assessment of the risk of bias a

From: Herpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV disease progression: a systematic review of observational studies

Study

Study Characteristics

Assessment of the risk of bias

Population

Nb

% Male

Baseline CD4

Baseline VL

Follow-up time

Eligibility

HSV-2 Ascertain-ment

Endpoints

Confoun-ding

Analysis

Attrition

OVERALL

Impact of biasc

Barnabas 2011

Men, International

88

100

NR

NR

NR

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

↓

Cachay 2007

Male HIV seroconverters, USA

294

100

497

4.97

205 days

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

N/A

Cachay 2008

Male HIV seroconverters, USA

119

100

520

5.04

779 days

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

N/A

Crum-Cianflone 2006

USA

367

92

499

NR

NR

Low

Moderate

Moderate

High

Moderate

Moderate

High

?

Nagot 2008

Women, Burkina Faso

140

0

443

4.48

12 weeks

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Low

N/A

Roxby 2011

Pregnant women, Kenya

296

0

422

4.75

18 months

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

↓

Suligoi 2001

HIV sero-converters, Italy

380

78

NR

NR

7.8 years

Low

Low

Moderate

High

Moderate

High

High

?

  1. aMedian values are reported unless noted otherwise. When values were not reported for overall population, a weighted average was taken.
  2. bN reported for patients included in relevant comparisons only.
  3. cAssessed only for studies deemed at moderate or high risk of bias. N/A = not applicable (ie. study at low risk of bias), ↓ indicates bias towards null, ? indicates uncertain bias of direction.