Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of the determine TB-LAM assay

From: Determine TB-LAM lateral flow urine antigen assay for HIV-associated tuberculosis: recommendations on the design and reporting of clinical studies

Study

Location

Patient population

No. of

Median CD4

Number of

Reference

Urine testing

Overall

Sensitivity by

Overall

Results by

   

patients

count (IQR)

TB cases

standard

(retrospective

sensitivity

CD4 count

specificity

grade 1

   

screened

 

(PTB/EPTB)

 

or prospective)

n/N (%)

n/N (%)

n/N (%)

or grade 2

           

cutoff

Lawn et al. (2012) [7]

Cape Town, South Africa

Active screening of HIV + outpatients pre-ART

516

170 (100–233)

PTB = 85

Sputum culture (liquid)

Retrospective

24/85 (28.2)

<50: 12/18 (66.7)

425/431 (98.6)

Grade 1

<100: 15/29 (51.7)

<200: 23/59 (39.0)

≥200: 1/25 (4.0)

Peter et al. (2012) [15]

Cape Town, South Africa

Inpatient HIV + TB suspects

281 TB suspects +88 non-TB controls

90 (47–197)

PTB + EPTB = 116

Sputum and non-sputum culture (liquid)

Retrospective

Grade 1 cutoff: 77/116 (66)

Grade 1 cutoff:

Grade 1 cutoff: 79/88 (89.8)†

Grade 1 and 2 reported

≤200: 58/81 (72) >200: 14/26 (54)

Grade 2 cutoff: 58/116 (50)

Grade 2 cutoff:

Grade 2 cutoff: 87/88 (98.9)†

≤200: 47/81 (58) >200: 7/26 (27)

Dorman et al. (2012) [16]

Cape Town, South Africa and Kampala, Uganda

Inpatient and outpatient HIV + TB suspects

997

152 (41-337)

Total cases = 16

Sputum culture (solid and liquid), + mycobacterial blood culture

Prospective

136/367 (37.1)

≤100: 116/196 (59.2)

559/573 (97.6)

Grade 2

PTB = 243

PTB + mycobact-eremia = 108

>100: 20/169 (11.8)

Mycobacteremia alone = 16

Van Rie et al. (2013) [17]

Johannesburg, South Africa

Mostly inpatient HIV + disseminated TB and EPTB suspects who could not produce sputum sample or were sputum smear and sputum Xpert negative (17% of patients NOT HIV+)

219

116 (34–221)

EPTB + disseminated = 51

Culture (sputum, blood, lymph node FNA, CSF pleural fluid, ascitic fluid, urine)

Not stated

Any positive culture- 35/51 (68.8)

In HIV-positives:

Any positive culture: (91.8)

Grade 2

<100: 82.6%

100–199: 63.3%

≥200: 40.0%

In HIV negatives: 0%

Drain et al. (2013) [18]

Durban, South Africa

Newly diagnosed HIV + out-patients

342

180 (73–311)

60 PTB (positive microbiology)

Sputum smear or culture or Positive microbiology + clinical diagnoses

Prospective

PTB (micro+) only: 17/60 (28.3)

PTB (micro+) only:

No micro + PTB diagnosis: 254/282 (90.1)

Unkown

<100: 12/32 (37.5)

100-199: 3/12 (25.0)

200-349: 1/3 (33.3)

≥350: 1/5 (20.0)

99 including PTB + EPTB + clinical diagnoses

All diagnoses: 24/99 (24.2)

All diagnoses

No TB diagnosis: 222/243 (91.2%)

<100: 14/50 (28.0)

100-199: 4/20 (20.0)

200-349: 2/6 (33.3)

≥ 350: 2/11 (18.2)

Shah et al. (2013) [19]

Uganda

Inpatient and outpatient HIV + TB suspects

101 TB cases + 105 TB suspects with TB excluded

60 among those with TB

103 PTB + EPTB

Sputum culture (solid and liquid), mycobacterial blood culture

Retrospective

50/103 (48.5)

<50:30/46 (65.2)

102/105 (97.1)

Grade 2

51-100: 12/17 (70.6)

101-200: 4/19 (21.1)

>200: 4/21 (19.0)

  1. †Specificity reported is for a control group of non-TB suspects to illustrate differences between grade 1 and 2 cut-offs.