Skip to main content

Table 1 The proportion of people living with HIV who tested TST-positive using a ≥5 mm and ≥10 mm cutoff size and the difference between these two proportions

From: The proportions of people living with HIV in low and middle-income countries who test tuberculin skin test positive using either a 5 mm or a 10 mm cut-off: a systematic review

Study

Number of patients (n)

Number of patients TST-positive using ≥5 mm cut-off (%)

Number of patients TST-positive using ≥10 mm cut-off (%)

Difference in proportion of patients testing TST-positive (%)

P-value

Africa

Allen et al. [9]

284

73 (25.7)

60 (21.1)

4.6

0.1977

Aisu et al. [10]

1094

579 (52.9)

376 (34.4)

18.6

<0.0001

Duncan et al. [11]

106

35 (33.0)

32 (30.2)

2.8

0.6576

Fordham von Reyn et al. [12]

104

21 (20.2)

20 (19.2)

1.0

0.8616

Diagbouga et al. [13]

37

9 (24.3)

6 (16.2)

1.7

0.3857

Waddell et al. [14]

58

16 (27.6)

15 (25.9)

8.1

0.8338

Mtei et al. [15]

460

192 (41.7)

175 (38.0)

3.7

0.2524

Tegbaru et al. [16]

116

47 (40.5)

38 (32.8)

7.8

0.2201

Rangaka et al. [17]

67

35 (52.2)

33 (49.3)

3.0

0.7297

Karam et al. [18]

273

59 (21.6)

46 (16.8)

4.8

0.1581

Hanifa et al. [19]

33

18 (54.5)

14 (42.4)

12.1

0.3245

Leidl et al. [20]

89

42 (47.2)

35 (39.3)

7.9

0.2896

Oni et al. [21]

240

138 (57.5)

125 (52.1)

5.4

0.2332

Samandari et al. [22]

1919

468 (24.4)

383 (20.0)

4.4

0.0010

The Americas

Espinal et al. [23]

86

50 (58.1)

40 (46.5)

11.6

0.1269

Fordham von Reyn et al. [12]

121

3 (2.5)

2 (1.7)

0.8

0.6513

Garcia-Garcia et al. [24]

801

261 (32.6)

174 (21.7)

10.9

<0.0001

Miranda et al. [25]

98

16 (16.3)

12 (12.2)

4.6

0.4142

Balcells et al. [26]

109

12 (11.0)

7 (6.4)

4.1

0.2299

Gutierrez et al. [27]

104

20 (19.2)

13 (12.5)

6.7

0.184

Baboolal et al. [28]

64

6 (9.4)

0

9.4

0.0121

Moura et al. [29]

864

170 (19.7)

152 (17.6)

2.1

0.2661

Asia

Suwanagool et al. [30]

399

323 (81.0)

173 (43.4)

37.6

<0.0001

Yanai et al. [31]

217

46 (21.2)

32 (14.7)

6.5

0.0801

Yanai et al. [31]

129

21 (16.3)

15 (11.6)

4.7

0.281

Sawhney et al. [32]

396

103 (26.0)

62 (15.7)

10.4

0.0003

Gupta et al. [33]

752

157 (20.9)

137 (18.2)

2.7

0.1935

Swaminathan et al. [34]

631

269 (42.6)

227 (36.0)

6.7

0.0155

Davarpanah et al. [35]

173

64 (37.0)

23 (13.3)

23.7

<0.0001

Davarpanah et al. [36]

459

131 (28.5)

60 (13.1)

15.5

<0.0001

Jiang et al. [37]

46

27 (58.7)

17 (37.0)

21.7

0.0369

Zhang et al. [38]

93

3 (3.2)

3 (3.2)

0

1

Kabeer et al. [39]

180

33 (18.3)

27 (15.0)

3.3

0.3961

Nguyen et al. [40]

369

204 (55.3)

175 (47.4)

8.1

0.0274