Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The receptive versus current risks of Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Northern Namibia: implications for elimination

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Abdisalan M Noor
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Cohen
27 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Musawenkosi Mabaso
11 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Abdisalan M Noor
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Justin Cohen
28 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Abdisalan M Noor
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Abdisalan M Noor
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
23 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-184

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement