Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sarcina ventriculi in blood: the first documented report since 1872

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dora Lam-Himlin
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Laass
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tamara Tuuminen
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dora Lam-Himlin
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Laass
14 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tamara Tuuminen
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Tamara Tuuminen
Resubmission - Version 6
25 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
25 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
8 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-13-169

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement