Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical data parameters used in the model; base-case and sensitivity analysis

From: Cost-effectiveness of posaconazole versusfluconazole or itraconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections among high-risk neutropenic patients in Spain

Sensitivity analysis

 

Base-case estimate

Deterministic

 

Probabilistic

 
  

Reference

 

Reference

Distribution

SD

Within first 100 days of prophylaxis

 

Probability of an invasive fungal infection (IFI)

 

Posaconazole

0.05

Cornely[10]

0.0344 -0.0573

Assumption

Beta

0.0120

SAT

0.11

Cornely[10]

0.0825 -0.1375

Assumption

Beta

0.0181

Probability of an IFI-related death

 

Posaconazole

0.36

Cornely[10]

0.2678 -0.4464

Assumption

Beta

0.1247

SAT

0.48

Cornely[10]

0.3636-0.6060

Assumption

Beta

0.0857

Probability of death from other causes (non IFI-related)

 

Posaconazole

0.16

Cornely[10]

0.1185-0.1975

Assumption

Beta

0.0148

SAT

0.16

Cornely[10]

0.1185-0.1975

Assumption

Beta

0.0148

After first 100 days of prophylaxis

 

Relative survival associated with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML)

 

IFI

0.21

NCI[32]

0.16-0.26

Assumption

Gamma

0.000

No IFI

0.21

NCI[32]

0.16-0.26

Assumption

Gamma

0.000

Relative survival associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

 

IFI

0.08

Kantarjian[33]

0.06-0.10

Assumption

Gamma

0.000

No IFI

0.08

Kantarjian[33]

0.06-0.10

Assumption

Gamma

0.000

  1. SAT standard azole treatment (fluconazole 81% patients or itraconazole 19% patients) SD standard deviation