Table 3 Distribution of studies by quality-scoring values according to the Chalmers et al. and Jadad et al. methods
Chalmers | Jadad score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Author [Reference No.] | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Protocol | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | Data analysis | Overall | 1 | 2 | 3 | Overall |
Yenice [16] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Di Bisceglie [17] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | n.a. | 0.35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Escudero [18] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
McHutchison [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.58 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.61 | 0.6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Ascione [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.54 | 1 | 1 | 0 | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Lee [21] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rumi [22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.54 | 1 | 1 | 0 | n.a. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |