Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Timing of progression from Chlamydia trachomatisinfection to pelvic inflammatory disease: a mathematical modelling study

  • Sereina A Herzog1Email author,
  • Christian L Althaus1,
  • Janneke CM Heijne1,
  • Pippa Oakeshott2,
  • Sally Kerry4,
  • Phillip Hay3 and
  • Nicola Low1
BMC Infectious Diseases201212:187

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-187

Received: 1 February 2012

Accepted: 25 July 2012

Published: 11 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Feb 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Gray
30 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Vickers
16 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lesley Wallace
16 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sereina Herzog
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Gray
13 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Vickers
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
11 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-187

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern
(2)
Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George’s, University of London
(3)
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, St George’s Hospital
(4)
Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London

Advertisement