Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Airport sentinel surveillance and entry quarantine for dengue infections following a fever screening program in Taiwan

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dounia Bitar
13 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 8
13 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
25 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lasse Vinner
29 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Althouse
24 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 10
24 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
24 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 11
24 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 11
25 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 12
25 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 12
28 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lasse Vinner
9 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dounia Bitar
13 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Althouse
26 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 13
26 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 13
Resubmission - Version 14
Submitted Manuscript version 14
29 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 15
29 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 15
13 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Althouse
11 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 16
11 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 16
11 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 17
11 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 17
Resubmission - Version 18
Submitted Manuscript version 18
1 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 19
1 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 19
4 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 20
4 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 20
5 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 21
5 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 21
Resubmission - Version 22
Submitted Manuscript version 22
17 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 23
17 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 23
18 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 24
18 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 24
18 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mei-Mei Kuan
Resubmission - Version 25
18 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 25
Publishing
24 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-12-182

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement