Table 1 Summary of HIV prevalence among clients in MMT in China

HTAs

Guangxi

17.7% (7.2-37.4%)

Zhou XP, 2009 [31]

28.2% (22.0-35.5%)

Chang ZR, 2010 [32]

27.9% (25.2-30.7%)

Bai Y, 2009 [33]

6.0% (4.2-8.4%)

Guizhou

20.7% (14.2-29.2%)

Chang ZR, 2010 [32]

24.6% (21.5-28.1%)

Han XJ, 2010 [34]

27.0% (22.3-32.2%)

Li XY, 2009 [35]

0.5% (0.1-3.5%)

Wang J, 2010 [36]

20.3% (14.5-27.7%)

Sichuan

7.1% (3.8-12.9%)

Hao C, 2006 [37]

13.6% (10.4-17.6%)

Qian HZ, 2007 [38]

14.0% (11.4-17.1%)

Chen B, 2009 [39]

2.0% (1.0-3.9%)

Liu JK, 2009 [40]

14.1% (8.2-23.2%)

Dong G, 2009 [41]

4.3% (2.6-7.0%)

Wang Y, 2009 [42]

3.8% (2.6-5.5%)

Wang DY, 2009 [43]

21.7% (18.9-24.9%)

Yao W, 2008 [44]

2.3% (1.4-3.6%)

Xinjiang

22.0% (15.2-30.6%)

Liu JB, 2006 [45]

19.4% (13.4-27.1%)

Fu LP, 2007 [46]

33.4% (29.7-37.3%)

Fang HR, 2008 [47]

14.2% (12.6-16.1%)

Re ZW, 2009 [48]

28.6% (22.4-35.7%)

Shen L, 2009 [49]

14.9% (12.8-17.3%)

Yuan L, 2010 [50]

26.55(20.8-33.0%)

Yunnan

36.0% (25.6-47.9%)

Duan YJ, 2008 [51]

33.3% (24.8-43.2%)

Zhang MJ, 2008 [52]

51.8% (44.2-59.3%)

Zhuang HY, 2008 [53]

66.7% (51.8-78.8%)

Xue HM, 2010 [54]

39.3% (37.1-41.5%)

Yang GW, 2010 [55]

15.7% (11.4-21.3%)

Yang YC, 2011 [56]

23.1% (21.7-24.5%)

LTAs

Beijing

4.6% (2.7-7.8%)

Du WJ, 2007 [57]

4.6% (2.7-7.8%)

Chongqing

6.8% (4.3-10.6%)

Tan XL, 2007 [58]

7.8% (5.5-11.0%)

Wu GH, 2010 [59]

9.2% (7.1-11.8%)

Zhou X, 2009 [60]

4.3% (3.0-6.1%)

Fujian

2.1% (1.1-3.9%)

Wu LH, 2007 [61]

2.0% (0.5-7.6%)

Zheng WX, 2009 [62]

2.1% (1.0-4.3%)

Gansu

0.7% (0.3-1.5%)

Gao LF, 2010 [63]

0.8% (0.2-3.2%)

Zhu XH, 2010 [64]

0.7% (0.2-1.7%)

Guangdong

3.6% (1.6-8.3%)

Dai LP, 2009 [65]

5.9% (2.7-12.6%)

Liu XY, 2009 [66]

1.2% (1.0-1.5%)

Zhang QL, 2008 [67]

0.2% (0.0-3.8%)

Chen W, 2009 [68]

20.7% (17.2-24.7%)

Chen A, 2007 [69]

19.6% (16.4-23.3%)

Dai LP, 2010 [70]

3.5% (1.8-6.6%)

Hu WS, 2010 [71]

9.6% (5.5-16.1%)

Li LY, 2009 [72]

1.0% (0.1-6.8%)

Li YF, 2009 [73]

2.5% (1.0-5.9%)

Wang M, 2009 [74]

1.3% (0.1-17.5%)

Wang CQ, 2009 [75]

1.9% (1.0-3.8%)

Wu ZL, 2010 [76]

7.9% (5.8-10.6%)

Xia L, 2010 [77]

1.2% (0.4-3.7%)

Henan

0.9% (0.2-3.6%)

Wu SX, 2009 [78]

0.9% (0.2-3.6%)

Hubei

0.1% (0.0-1.8%)

Qiu XQ, 2009 [79]

0.1% (0.0-1.8%)

Hunan

6.9% (4.1-11.4%)

Li XL, 2008 [80]

1.2% (0.3-4.7%)

Li XL, 2009 [81]

16.7% (14.2-19.7%)

Tang XY, 2007 [82]

14.7% (10.2-20.7%)

Chen LF, 2009 [83]

13.7% (10.3-18.1%)

He HX, 2008 [84]

9.5% (7.5-12.0%)

Chen C, 2010 [85]

1.9% (0.5-7.2%)

Feng YH, 2010 [86]

0.6% (0.2-1.8%)

Jiangsu

0.9% (0.5-1.5%)

Wang YP, 2009 [87]

1.4% (0.5-4.3%)

Feng SQ, 2010 [88]

1.1% (0.4-2.8%)

Hao C, 2009 [89]

0.6% (0.2-1.6%)

Xu GY, 2008 [90]

0.5% (0.0-7.3%)

Zhang MH, 2010 [91]

1.0% (0.3-3.0%)

Yuan ZX, 2010 [92]

0.2% (0.0-3.4%)

Ningxia

1.2% (0.5-2.6%)

Jiang A, 2009 [93]

1.2% (0.5-2.6%)

Qinghai

1.4% (0.5-3.8%)

Hao XQ, 2009 [94]

1.4% (0.5-3.8%)

Shaanxi

1.4% (0.5-3.8%)

Jia W, 2008 [95]

1.7% (0.7-3.9%)

Zhang HF, 2009 [96]

0.4% (0.0-6.3%)

Shanghai

1.4% (0.5-4.8%)

Liu Y, 2009 [97]

1.5% (0.5-4.4%)

Li T, 2010 [98]

1.0% (0.1-13.6%)

Zhejiang

0.5% (0.1-1.6%)

Cai CP, 2008 [99]

0.6% (0.0-8.4%)

Zhang XH, 2008 [100]

0.6% (0.1-4.2%)

Su MF, 2010 [101]

0.3% (0.0-2.3%)