|
Groups
|
Provinces
|
No of studies
|
Study Year
|
Prevalence (individual studies) (95% CI)
|
Pooled prevalence (provinces) (95% CI)
|
Pooled prevalence (group) (95% CI)
|
|---|
|
HTAs
|
Guangxi
|
3
| | |
17.7% (7.2-37.4%)
|
17.5% (14.0-21.6%)
|
|
Zhou XP, 2009 [31]
| |
2007
|
28.2% (22.0-35.5%)
| |
|
Chang ZR, 2010 [32]
| |
2008
|
27.9% (25.2-30.7%)
| |
|
Bai Y, 2009 [33]
| |
2009
|
6.0% (4.2-8.4%)
| |
| |
Guizhou
|
4
| | |
20.7% (14.2-29.2%)
|
|
Chang ZR, 2010 [32]
| |
2008
|
24.6% (21.5-28.1%)
| |
|
Han XJ, 2010 [34]
| |
2009
|
27.0% (22.3-32.2%)
| |
|
Li XY, 2009 [35]
| |
2009
|
0.5% (0.1-3.5%)
| |
|
Wang J, 2010 [36]
| |
2009
|
20.3% (14.5-27.7%)
| |
| |
Sichuan
|
8
| | |
7.1% (3.8-12.9%)
|
|
Hao C, 2006 [37]
| |
2004
|
13.6% (10.4-17.6%)
| |
|
Qian HZ, 2007 [38]
| |
2005
|
14.0% (11.4-17.1%)
| |
|
Chen B, 2009 [39]
| |
2006
|
2.0% (1.0-3.9%)
| |
|
Liu JK, 2009 [40]
| |
2006
|
14.1% (8.2-23.2%)
| |
|
Dong G, 2009 [41]
| |
2007
|
4.3% (2.6-7.0%)
| |
|
Wang Y, 2009 [42]
| |
2008
|
3.8% (2.6-5.5%)
| |
|
Wang DY, 2009 [43]
| |
2008
|
21.7% (18.9-24.9%)
| |
|
Yao W, 2008 [44]
| |
2008
|
2.3% (1.4-3.6%)
| |
| |
Xinjiang
|
6
| | |
22.0% (15.2-30.6%)
|
|
Liu JB, 2006 [45]
| |
2005
|
19.4% (13.4-27.1%)
| |
|
Fu LP, 2007 [46]
| |
2006
|
33.4% (29.7-37.3%)
| |
|
Fang HR, 2008 [47]
| |
2008
|
14.2% (12.6-16.1%)
| |
|
Re ZW, 2009 [48]
| |
2008
|
28.6% (22.4-35.7%)
| |
|
Shen L, 2009 [49]
| |
2008
|
14.9% (12.8-17.3%)
| |
|
Yuan L, 2010 [50]
| |
2008
|
26.55(20.8-33.0%)
| |
| |
Yunnan
|
6
| | |
36.0% (25.6-47.9%)
|
|
Duan YJ, 2008 [51]
| |
2006
|
33.3% (24.8-43.2%)
| |
|
Zhang MJ, 2008 [52]
| |
2007
|
51.8% (44.2-59.3%)
| |
|
Zhuang HY, 2008 [53]
| |
2007
|
66.7% (51.8-78.8%)
| |
|
Xue HM, 2010 [54]
| |
2008
|
39.3% (37.1-41.5%)
| |
|
Yang GW, 2010 [55]
| |
2008
|
15.7% (11.4-21.3%)
| |
|
Yang YC, 2011 [56]
| |
2009
|
23.1% (21.7-24.5%)
| |
|
LTAs
|
Beijing
|
1
| | |
4.6% (2.7-7.8%)
|
2.4% (1.6-3.5%)
|
|
Du WJ, 2007 [57]
| |
2005
|
4.6% (2.7-7.8%)
| |
| |
Chongqing
|
3
| | |
6.8% (4.3-10.6%)
|
|
Tan XL, 2007 [58]
| |
2005
|
7.8% (5.5-11.0%)
| |
|
Wu GH, 2010 [59]
| |
2007
|
9.2% (7.1-11.8%)
| |
|
Zhou X, 2009 [60]
| |
2008
|
4.3% (3.0-6.1%)
| |
| |
Fujian
|
2
| | |
2.1% (1.1-3.9%)
|
|
Wu LH, 2007 [61]
| |
2006
|
2.0% (0.5-7.6%)
| |
|
Zheng WX, 2009 [62]
| |
2006
|
2.1% (1.0-4.3%)
| |
| |
Gansu
|
2
| | |
0.7% (0.3-1.5%)
|
|
Gao LF, 2010 [63]
| |
2009
|
0.8% (0.2-3.2%)
| |
|
Zhu XH, 2010 [64]
| |
2010
|
0.7% (0.2-1.7%)
| |
| |
Guangdong
|
13
| | |
3.6% (1.6-8.3%)
|
|
Dai LP, 2009 [65]
| |
2007
|
5.9% (2.7-12.6%)
| |
|
Liu XY, 2009 [66]
| |
2007
|
1.2% (1.0-1.5%)
| |
|
Zhang QL, 2008 [67]
| |
2007
|
0.2% (0.0-3.8%)
| |
|
Chen W, 2009 [68]
| |
2008
|
20.7% (17.2-24.7%)
| |
|
Chen A, 2007 [69]
| |
2008
|
19.6% (16.4-23.3%)
| |
|
Dai LP, 2010 [70]
| |
2008
|
3.5% (1.8-6.6%)
| |
|
Hu WS, 2010 [71]
| |
2008
|
9.6% (5.5-16.1%)
| |
|
Li LY, 2009 [72]
| |
2008
|
1.0% (0.1-6.8%)
| |
|
Li YF, 2009 [73]
| |
2008
|
2.5% (1.0-5.9%)
| |
|
Wang M, 2009 [74]
| |
2008
|
1.3% (0.1-17.5%)
| |
|
Wang CQ, 2009 [75]
| |
2009
|
1.9% (1.0-3.8%)
| |
|
Wu ZL, 2010 [76]
| |
2009
|
7.9% (5.8-10.6%)
| |
|
Xia L, 2010 [77]
| |
2009
|
1.2% (0.4-3.7%)
| |
| |
Henan
|
1
| | |
0.9% (0.2-3.6%)
|
|
Wu SX, 2009 [78]
| |
2008
|
0.9% (0.2-3.6%)
| |
| |
Hubei
|
1
| | |
0.1% (0.0-1.8%)
|
|
Qiu XQ, 2009 [79]
| |
2006
|
0.1% (0.0-1.8%)
| |
| |
Hunan
|
7
| | |
6.9% (4.1-11.4%)
|
| |
Li XL, 2008 [80]
| |
2006
|
1.2% (0.3-4.7%)
| |
| |
Li XL, 2009 [81]
| |
2006
|
16.7% (14.2-19.7%)
| |
| |
Tang XY, 2007 [82]
| |
2006
|
14.7% (10.2-20.7%)
| |
| |
Chen LF, 2009 [83]
| |
2007
|
13.7% (10.3-18.1%)
| |
| |
He HX, 2008 [84]
| |
2007
|
9.5% (7.5-12.0%)
| |
| |
Chen C, 2010 [85]
| |
2008
|
1.9% (0.5-7.2%)
| |
| |
Feng YH, 2010 [86]
| |
2009
|
0.6% (0.2-1.8%)
| |
| |
Jiangsu
|
6
| | |
0.9% (0.5-1.5%)
|
|
Wang YP, 2009 [87]
| |
2007
|
1.4% (0.5-4.3%)
| |
|
Feng SQ, 2010 [88]
| |
2008
|
1.1% (0.4-2.8%)
| |
|
Hao C, 2009 [89]
| |
2008
|
0.6% (0.2-1.6%)
| |
|
Xu GY, 2008 [90]
| |
2008
|
0.5% (0.0-7.3%)
| |
|
Zhang MH, 2010 [91]
| |
2008
|
1.0% (0.3-3.0%)
| |
|
Yuan ZX, 2010 [92]
| |
2009
|
0.2% (0.0-3.4%)
| |
| |
Ningxia
|
1
| | |
1.2% (0.5-2.6%)
|
|
Jiang A, 2009 [93]
| |
2007
|
1.2% (0.5-2.6%)
| |
| |
Qinghai
|
1
| | |
1.4% (0.5-3.8%)
|
|
Hao XQ, 2009 [94]
| |
2008
|
1.4% (0.5-3.8%)
| |
| |
Shaanxi
|
2
| | |
1.4% (0.5-3.8%)
|
|
Jia W, 2008 [95]
| |
2006
|
1.7% (0.7-3.9%)
| |
|
Zhang HF, 2009 [96]
| |
2008
|
0.4% (0.0-6.3%)
| |
| |
Shanghai
|
2
| | |
1.4% (0.5-4.8%)
|
|
Liu Y, 2009 [97]
| |
2008
|
1.5% (0.5-4.4%)
| |
|
Li T, 2010 [98]
| |
2009
|
1.0% (0.1-13.6%)
| |
| |
Zhejiang
|
3
| | |
0.5% (0.1-1.6%)
|
|
Cai CP, 2008 [99]
| |
2007
|
0.6% (0.0-8.4%)
| |
|
Zhang XH, 2008 [100]
| |
2007
|
0.6% (0.1-4.2%)
| |
| |
Su MF, 2010 [101]
| |
2009
|
0.3% (0.0-2.3%)
| | |
