Study | Location | Participants | Study design | Specimen type | Response rate (%) | Sex | Age (years) | Study period | Tested (n) | Positive (n) | Prevalence % (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Population | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Hocking [16] | VIC (Melb) | Women recruited from the telephone directory | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 43 | F | 18–35 | 2003–2004 | 657 | 6 | 0.9 (0.3, 2.0) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (18–24) |  | 135 | 5 | 3.7 (1.2, 8.4) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (25–35) |  | 489 | 1 | 0.2 (0.0, 1.1) |
Community | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Debattista [17] | QLD (Bris) | University students at residential colleges | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 30–50 | F | <25 | 1997 | 178 | 2 | 1.1 (0.1, 4.0)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  | M |  |  | 96 | 0 | 0 (0.0, 3.8)* |
Debattista [18] | QLD (Bris) | High school students | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 30–50 | F | 15–18 | 1998–2001 | 516 | 12 | 2.3 (1.2, 4.0)** |
 |  |  |  |  |  | M |  | (1998) | 170 | 2 | 1.2 (0.2, 4.6)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1999) | 147 | 5 | 3.4 (1.3, 8.2)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2000) | 101 | 0 | 0 (0.0, 4.6)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2001) | 98 | 5 | 5.1 (1.9, 12.1)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1998–2001 | 658 | 3 | 0.5 (0.1, 1.3)** |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1998) | 339 | 0 | 0 (0.0, 1.4)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (1999) | 132 | 1 | 0.8 (0.0, 4.8)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2000) | 94 | 0 | 0 (0.0, 4.9)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (2001) | 93 | 2 | 2.2 (0.4, 8.3)* |
Bowden [19] | ACT | High school students | Cross-sectional survey | F: urine/ swab | 31 | F | 15–20 | 2002–2003 | 273 | 2 | 0.7 (0.1, 2.6) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | M |  |  | 179 | 3 | 1.7 (0.3, 4.8) |
 |  |  |  | M: urine |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Davis [20] | ACT | Tertiary students recruited at outreach screening services | Clinical outreach pilot | Urine | 29.4 | M/F | 16–26 | 2007 | 445 | 8 | 1.8 (0.1, 3.5)* |
Gold [21] | VIC (rural/ regional) | Men attending rural football clubs | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 85 | M | 16–29 | 2006–2007 | 77 | 3 | 3.9 (0.8, 11.0) |
Wade [22] | VIC (Melb) | Heterosexual men attending sporting clubs | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 87 | M | 16–29 | n.r. | 47 | 4 | 8.5 (2.4, 20.4)** |
Buhrer-Skinner [23] | QLD (Towns-ville) | Individuals attending outreach screening services set up in a variety of community locations | Cross-sectional survey | M: urine | n.r. | M/F | 21A | 2004–2005 | 303 | 15 | 5.0 (2.8, 8.0)* |
 |  |  |  | F: urine/ swab |  | (M) | 25 |  | 75 | 5 | Army: 6.7 (2.2, 14.9) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | (M/F) | 21 |  | 95 | 5 | University: 5.3 (1.7, 11.9) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | (M/F) | 17 |  | 68 | 0 | High school festivities: 0 (0, 5.3) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | (M/F) | 25 |  | 65 | 5 | Backpackers: 7.7 (2.5, 17.0) |
Kong [24]; Kong [25] | VIC (rural/ regional) | Young people attending sporting clubs | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | >95 | F | 16–29 | 2007 | 121 | 9 | 7.4 (3.5, 13.7)** |
 |  |  |  |  |  | M |  |  | 426 | 19 | 4.5 (2.7, 6.9) |
Sacks-Davis [26] | VIC (Melb) | Young people attending a music festival | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 21 | F | 16–29 | 2009 | 46 | 0 | 0 (0.0, 7.7)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  | M |  |  | 21 | 1 | 4.8 (0.1, 23.8)* |
Davies [27] | NSW (Sydney) | Young international backpackers recruited at hostels | Cross-sectional survey | F: swab | 45.7 | F | 18–30 | 2009 | 207 | 8 | 3.9 (1.7, 7.5) |
 |  |  |  | M: urine | 50.2 | M | (≤25) |  | 166 | 5 | 3.0 (1.0, 6.9)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26–30) |  | 41 | 3 | 7.3 (1.5, 19.9)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18–30 |  | 225 | 7 | 3.1 (1.3, 6.3) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (≤25) |  | 164 | 6 | 3.7 (1.4, 7.8)* |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26–30) |  | 61 | 1 | 1.6 (0.4, 8.8)* |
General Practice | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |
Heal [28] | QLD (Mackay) | Young people attending general practices | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 68 | F/M | 18–24 | 2001 | 443 | 17 | 3.8 (2.3, 6.1)* |
Chiang [29] | VIC (rural) | Women attending general practices | Cross-sectional survey | Swab | n.d. | F | 15–35 | n.r. | 67 | 9 | 13.4 (6.3, 24.0)* |
Toyne [30] | ACT | Women attending general practices | Cross-sectional survey | Swab | n.d. | F | 17–39 | 2002–2003 | 353 | 4 | 1.1 (0.3, 2.9) |
Bowden [31] | ACT | Women attending general practices | Cluster randomised controlled trial | Swab/ urine | 6.9 in intervention; 4.5 in control | F | 16–39 | 2004–2005 | 1593 | 69 | 4.3 (3.4, 5.5) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (16–19) |  | 196 | 10 | 5.1 (2.5, 9.2) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (20–25) |  | 576 | 37 | 6.4 (4.6, 8.7) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (26–30) |  | 425 | 19 | 4.5 (2.7, 6.9) |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | (31–39) |  | 396 | 3 | 0.7 (0.2, 2.2) |
Hince [32] | WA (Perth) | Men attending general practices | Cross-sectional survey | Urine | 63–100 | M | 15–29 | 2007–2008 | 383 | 14 | 3.7 (2.0, 6.1)** |
Bilardi [33] | VIC (urban and rural) | Women attending general practices | Cluster randomised controlled trial | Any | 6.2–11.5 | F | 16–24 | 2008–2009 | 843 | 66 | 7.8 (6.1, 9.9)* |
Walker [34] | Australia-wide | Women attending primary health care clinics | Cross-sectional survey | Swab | 66 | F | 16–25 | 2007–2008 | 738 | 25 | 3.4 (1.5, 5.3) |