Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole for treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans: a multivariate analysis of factors associated with improved outcome

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
24 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J Peter Donnelly
10 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - claudio viscoli
14 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Annette Reboli
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - claudio viscoli
12 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - J Peter Donnelly
2 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Annette Reboli
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
30 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-11-261

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement