Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin in critically ill immunocompromised patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre-Emmanuel Charles
28 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Kopterides
23 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Martin Brunkhorst
30 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - barraud damien
11 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Michael Darmon
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petros Kopterides
1 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - barraud damien
12 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre-Emmanuel Charles
5 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Michael Darmon
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Michael Darmon
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Michael Darmon
Resubmission - Version 6
26 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
27 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Michael Darmon
Resubmission - Version 8
27 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
24 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-11-224

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement