Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Unnecessary use of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in hospitalized patients

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Curry
22 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Morgan
4 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Senthil Lingaratnam
16 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Curtis Donskey
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Curtis Donskey
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Curtis Donskey
Resubmission - Version 4
27 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Curtis Donskey
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Curtis Donskey
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
5 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
5 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-11-187

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement