Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of bias assessment of eligible studies included in a meta-analysis of prolonged infusion versus intermittent infusion of β-lactams in hospitalized patients

From: Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

Study

Funding Source

Allocation Sequence Adequately Generated

Allocation Concealment

Masking

Similar Rates of Withdrawals Between Groups

Intention to Treat Analysis

Angus 2000

Wellcome Trust of Great Britain

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

Bodey 1979

Pharmaceutical company

Yes

Yes

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Buck 2005

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Georges 2005

Not specified

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Hanes 2000

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

No

Kojika 2005

Not specified

Unclear

No

No

Yes

Yes

Lagast 1983

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Yes

Lau 2006

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

No

Lubasch 2003

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

No

Unclear

Unclear

Merchant 2008

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Nicolau 2001

Pharmaceutical company

Yes

Unclear

No

Yes

No

Rafati 2006

Tehran University Medical Sciences Research Board

Unclear

Unclear

No

Yes

Yes

Roberts 2007

National Health & Medical Research Council

Yes

Yes

Yesa

Yes

Yes

Van Zanten 2006

Pharmaceutical company

Unclear

Unclear

No

No

No

  1. aOnly outcome assessors were masked