Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean Booth Coverage by District and CMC Status, 2008-2009

From: Outcomes of polio eradication activities in Uttar Pradesh, India: the Social Mobilization Network (SM Net) and Core Group Polio Project (CGPP)

  Booth Coverage (%) (95% Confidence Interval)  
  Non-CMC Areas (n = 56) CMC Areas (n = 56) P-Value
All Districts 49.8 (46.5, 53.1) 68.8 (66.9, 70.6) < .001*, **
By District    
   Baghpat 56.2 (53.0, 59.4) 75.3 (72.3, 78.2) < .001**
   Bareilly 52.6 (48.7, 56.5) 62.8 (56.5, 69.1) < .05**
   Mau 37.2 (34.7, 39.9) 60.9 (57.5, 64.2) < .001**
   Meerut 62.8 (56.4, 69.3) 73.3 (66.9, 79.8) < .05**
   Moradabad 56.0 (49.7, 62.3) 69.9 (65.8, 74.0) < .001**
   Muzafarnagar 49.5 (46.5, 52.5) 70.2 (66.6, 73.9) < .001**
   Rampur 53.8 (52.4, 55.2) 65.2 (62.5, 67.9) < .001**
   Saharanpur 55.7 (49.8, 61.5) 72.8 (66.5, 79.1) < .001**
   Shahjahanpur 47.9 (41.3, 54.5) 71.2 (68.9, 73.4) < .001**
   Sitapur 24.2 (21.4, 27.0) 62.8 (59.8, 65.7) < .001**
  1. * Bivariate analysis of Booth Coverage by CMC Status using generalized estimating equations (standard errors adjusted for clustering by block/CMC Status)
  2. ** Multivariate Analysis of Booth Coverage by CMC Status controlling for District, and including interaction of District with CMC Status, using generalized estimating equations (standard errors adjusted for clustering by block/CMC Status)