Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean Booth Coverage by District and CMC Status, 2008-2009

From: Outcomes of polio eradication activities in Uttar Pradesh, India: the Social Mobilization Network (SM Net) and Core Group Polio Project (CGPP)

 

Booth Coverage (%) (95% Confidence Interval)

 
 

Non-CMC Areas (n = 56)

CMC Areas (n = 56)

P-Value

All Districts

49.8 (46.5, 53.1)

68.8 (66.9, 70.6)

< .001*, **

By District

   

   Baghpat

56.2 (53.0, 59.4)

75.3 (72.3, 78.2)

< .001**

   Bareilly

52.6 (48.7, 56.5)

62.8 (56.5, 69.1)

< .05**

   Mau

37.2 (34.7, 39.9)

60.9 (57.5, 64.2)

< .001**

   Meerut

62.8 (56.4, 69.3)

73.3 (66.9, 79.8)

< .05**

   Moradabad

56.0 (49.7, 62.3)

69.9 (65.8, 74.0)

< .001**

   Muzafarnagar

49.5 (46.5, 52.5)

70.2 (66.6, 73.9)

< .001**

   Rampur

53.8 (52.4, 55.2)

65.2 (62.5, 67.9)

< .001**

   Saharanpur

55.7 (49.8, 61.5)

72.8 (66.5, 79.1)

< .001**

   Shahjahanpur

47.9 (41.3, 54.5)

71.2 (68.9, 73.4)

< .001**

   Sitapur

24.2 (21.4, 27.0)

62.8 (59.8, 65.7)

< .001**

  1. * Bivariate analysis of Booth Coverage by CMC Status using generalized estimating equations (standard errors adjusted for clustering by block/CMC Status)
  2. ** Multivariate Analysis of Booth Coverage by CMC Status controlling for District, and including interaction of District with CMC Status, using generalized estimating equations (standard errors adjusted for clustering by block/CMC Status)