This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydiascreening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis
© Broek et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 30 September 2009
Accepted: 7 April 2010
Published: 7 April 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Sep 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Hendrik Richardus|
|2 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jade Bilardi|
|10 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nils Reinton|
|23 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jade Bilardi|
|18 Mar 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jan Hendrik Richardus|
|26 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Eline Op de Coul|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Apr 2010||Editorially accepted|
|7 Apr 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-10-89|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.