This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine against invasive pneumococcal disease in people 60 years or older
© Vila-Corcoles et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 18 December 2009
Accepted: 18 March 2010
Published: 18 March 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Dec 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Musher|
|4 Feb 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - José Bayas|
|22 Feb 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Olga Ochoa-Gondar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Feb 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Mar 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Olga Ochoa-Gondar|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Mar 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Mar 2010||Editorially accepted|
|18 Mar 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2334-10-73|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.